All posts by Daniel Lacalle

About Daniel Lacalle

Daniel Lacalle (Madrid, 1967). PhD Economist and Fund Manager. Author of bestsellers "Life In The Financial Markets" and "The Energy World Is Flat" as well as "Escape From the Central Bank Trap". Daniel Lacalle (Madrid, 1967). PhD Economist and Fund Manager. Frequent collaborator with CNBC, Bloomberg, CNN, Hedgeye, Epoch Times, Mises Institute, BBN Times, Wall Street Journal, El Español, A3 Media and 13TV. Holds the CIIA (Certified International Investment Analyst) and masters in Economic Investigation and IESE.

Video: Escape from the Central Bank Trap

Video summary of my new book, Escape from the Central Bank Trap, available at Amazon in the US and UK.

Summary:
Central banks do not print growth.
The financial crisis was much more than the result of an excess of risk. The same policies that created each subsequent bust are the ones that have been implemented in recent years. This book is about realistic solutions for the threat of zero-interest rates and excessive liquidity.
The United States needs to take the first step, defending sound money and a balanced budget, recovering the middle-class by focusing on increasing disposable income. The rest will follow. Our future should not be low growth and high debt. Cheap money becomes very expensive in the long run.
There is an escape from the Central Bank Trap.

Biography:

Daniel Lacalle is a PhD economist, chief investment officer at Tressis Gestión, and professor of global economy. Holds a PhD in economics, the certified international investment analyst title, a post graduate degree in IESE, and a master’s degree in economic investigation (UCV). He is a member of the advisory board of the Rafael del Pino Foundation, and professor at IE business school and the Institute of Stock Market Studies (IEB). He was ranked one of the Top 20 most influential economists in the world in 2016 (Richtopia).

Twitter: @dlacalle_IA

website: dlacalle.com

Draghi doesn’t see “bubbles”. Let me show them to you

Mario Draghi has again missed an exceptional opportunity to adjust monetary policy. By ignoring the huge risks that are being created from the brutal inflation of financial assets, saying that “there are no signs of a bubble“, the European Central Bank (ECB) remains adamantly foused on creating inflation by decree, denying the effects of technology, demography and overcapacity.

“No signs of bubble”? I’ll show you some of them myself .

– Percentage of debt of major countries “bought” by the ECB: Germany, 17%, France 14%, Italy 12% and Spain 16%. In all cases, in 2016 and 2015 the ECB was the largest buyer of said countries’ net emissions.

Ask yourself a question: On the day the ECB stops buying, which of you would buy peripheral or European bonds at these prices? Clearly, the first sign of a bubble is the absence of demand in the secondary that offsets the impact of the ECB. It indicates that the current price is simply unacceptable in an open market, even if the recovery is confirmed, especially because rates do not even reflect a minimum real return, being below inflation.

– European Union high-yield bonds are trading at record-low yields despite the fact that cash generation and debt repayment capacity, according to Moody’s and Fitch, have not improved significantly

– European largest stocks (Eurostoxx 50) trade at 20x PE and 8.3x EV/EBITDA despite eight years of flat earnings and downgrades, which have only just recently reversed.

– Infrastructure deals’ multiples have increase five-fold in three years to an astonishing average of 16-19x EBITDA.

Excess liquidity in the euro zone already reaches 1.2 trillion euros. It has multiplied by almost seven since the “stimulus” program was launched.

Anything for Inflation

There is a problem in the huge amount of assets bought by the ECB, whose balance sheet already exceeds 25% of the European Union’s GDP. At the beginning of the repurchase program, it could be argued that risky assets, especially sovereign bonds, could have been cheap or under-valued because of the risk of break-up of the euro and overall negative sentiment. However, that statement cannot be made today, with bond yields at historical lows and debt levels at historical highs. Monetary policy is a perverse incentive to spend more and add more debt .

Of course, what the ECB expects is the arrival of the inflation mantra , that mirage that deficit states yearn for and no consumer has ever wanted.

But the search for inflation by decree meets the pitfall of reality. The positive disinflation that the technological advance generates (read George Selgin) adds to the logical change of consumption patterns due to ageing of the population and the elephant in the room: The European Union has never had a problem of lack of investment, but of excess spending on dozens of industrial and infrastructure plans that have left behind some positive effects, but – due to excessgreater debt and overcapacity .

Now that prices are moderating again with the dilution of the base effect, the opportunity to moderate this unnecessary monetary stimulus is lost. As I explained at CNBC on Monday, the supposed positive effects of the buyback program cannot make us ignore the accumulation of risk in sovereign and corporate bonds and the dangerous impact on the financial sector.

Draghi, at least, warns

The president of the ECB does not stop alerting governments about the importance of reforms to drive growth, lower taxes and reduced imbalances, but no one hears. When Draghi warns banks of their weaknesses, they don’t listen either. When he reminds deficit spending governments that monetary policy has an expiration date, they look the other way. It’s party time .

Monetary policy is “like Coca-Cola,” said Jens Weidmann , president of the Bundesbank. A drink that stimulates, but has too much sugar and no real healing qualities.

The problem of losing this opportunity to moderate monetary policy is that it is highly unlikely that the necessary measures will be taken to correct excesses when they are no longer a debate of economic analyst, but evident to all citizens. Because then, the central bank will be afraid of a financial market correction, after a bubble inflated by its policies.

European governments make a huge mistake thinking that prosperity is going to be generated from debt and not from savings. But they make an even bigger mistake if they think that by perpetuating the imbalances, they will prevent a crisis.

At the press conference, Draghi said that “nobody knows when or where the next crisis will come: the only sure thing is that it will come“.

What Draghi did not explain is that the artificial creation of money without support, well above real economic growth, is always behind those crises. But that is another problem, that will be dealt with by the next president of the Central Bank, who will offer the “new” solution … Yes, you have guessed it: Cut rates and increase liquidity.

Daniel Lacalle has a PhD in Economics and is author of “Escape from the Central Bank Trap”, “Life In The Financial Markets” and “The Energy World Is Flat” (Wiley)

@dlacalle_IA

Picture courtesy of Google

Video: Oil Markets Remain Oversupplied Despite OPEC cut (TV)

U.S. drillers have now added rigs for 19 straight weeks, to 722, the highest amount since April 2015. Almost all of the recent U.S. output increases (10% since mid-2016 to over 9.3 million bopd, close to top producer levels Russia and Saudi Arabia) have been onshore, from shale oilfields. Even if the rig count did not rise further, Goldman Sachs said it estimates that U.S. oil production “would increase by 785,000 bopd between 4Q16 and 4Q17 across the Permian, Eagle Ford, Bakken and Niobrara shale plays.” (Reuters)

As we explained here, The OPEC meeting has failed, again. The decision to cut production was announced months ago as a great triumph because it included countries outside the organization. And it was a mistake. The result, several months after the largest production cut in history, could not be further from what the organization expected. Oil inventories in the OECD rose to five-year highs, the United States also recorded record levels of crude oil in storage despite a healthy demand, growing by more than a million barrels a day in annualized terms. However, oil prices remained far below those levels desired by OPEC, and especially its more wasteful members, Venezuela in particular.

Why? OPEC has underestimated the reaction of new technologies and independent producers. The cut by OPEC has been the biggest gift to shale in a long time. The US achieved a production growth that has surprised the most optimistic, and the country is closer to energy independence. That the US imports less and stores more, affects oil prices in several ways. On the one hand, US producers have done their homework and increased their efficiency and reduced costs by more than 40%, which has allowed them to be competitive at $45 a barrel. This makes the price of oil lose strength in the face of evidence that the market is better supplied and more diversified than expected.

There is another very important effect. The “oil weapon” mentioned by Chavez years ago has run out of gunpowder. With the drastic reduction of US oil imports, the geopolitical premium historically added to the price of oil due to the US dependence on politically unstable countries, disappears.
Evidence from recent years shows us that the success of the American energy revolution, carried out without any support from the Obama Administration, is twofold. The dream of energy independence of the world’s largest energy consumer is ever closer, and the combination of shale, renewables, coal and natural gas, has been an essential factor in competitiveness, growth, employment and has destroyed the power of OPEC to manipulate the price of oil.

Daniel Lacalle has a PhD in Economics and is author of “Escape from the Central Bank Trap”, “Life In The Financial Markets” and “The Energy World Is Flat” (Wiley)

@dlacalle_IA

 

Video: ECB needs to stop its QE program now (TV)

With c€1.3 trillion in excess liquidity, and banks suffering from ZIRP, the ECB is likely to create more problems than benefits if it maintains its quantitative easing program.

Daniel Lacalle is a PhD in Economics and author of  “Escape from the Central Bank Trap” (BEP), “Life In The Financial Markets”and “The Energy World Is Flat” (Wiley).

@dlacalle_IA